👥 250,000 Trained
🏆 9 x Award Winners
⭐ 96% Review Rating
📈 24 Years of Proven Results
Written by Sean McPheat | 
The short answer: the 10 B2B sales techniques that consistently make a difference are research, trust-building, purposeful interaction, real listening, controlling the controllables, looking after your existing base, uncovering genuine pain points, selling through stories, handling rejection without drama, and treating every sales experience — good or bad — as something to learn from.
If you’ve been in B2B sales for any length of time, none of that will shock you. The problem isn’t knowing the list. It’s applying it consistently when you’ve got a difficult quarter, a full pipeline that keeps stalling, and a manager asking for updates three times a week.
I’ve been working with sales teams for over 20 years now. And the truth is that the gap between average salespeople and excellent ones rarely comes down to technical knowledge. They both know what good looks like. The difference is discipline and, underneath that, genuine curiosity about the person on the other side of the table.
Worth stating before we go any further, because I see these terms used interchangeably and they’re not the same thing.
A technique is what you do in the room — or on the call. How do you open? How you respond to an objection. How do you ask for the next step without it feeling awkward? It’s the tactical stuff. The things you can practise and get better at through repetition.
Active listening. Reframing objections. The way you use silence. These are techniques. They’re the tools you reach for when you’re in the middle of a live conversation.
Strategy is the thinking that happens before any of that. Which sectors are you targeting and why? What’s your value proposition against the competitors your prospects are also talking to? What does your sales plan look like across the quarter? Who’s the actual decision-maker and how do you get in front of them?
You need both. This seems obvious, but here’s where I see it go wrong most often: sales teams with a sharp strategy and poor technique lose deals they should win because the individual interactions fall apart. And salespeople with strong technique but no strategic discipline waste their time having great conversations with the completely wrong people. Neither situation is good.
A few frameworks that are worth knowing — not because you should follow them rigidly, but because they give you a useful starting structure when you’re thinking about your own approach.
Simple follow-up structure: contact a prospect two days after your initial conversation, then two weeks later, then two months after that.
Most lost deals aren’t lost because the prospect said a firm no. They’re lost because the salesperson gave up after one or two attempts and moved on. The 2-2-2 method keeps you in the game through a structured cadence without tipping over into nuisance territory. It also removes the mental effort of deciding when to follow up — you just know.
Credibility, Curiosity, Creativity, Communication, Consistency, Commitment, Customer focus. Different people will give you slightly different versions of this framework, but the point is the same: what makes you effective in B2B sales isn’t any single tactic. It’s the combination of qualities you bring to every interaction, consistently.
Credibility is the one I’d put first. B2B buyers are careful — they’re spending company money and are answerable for the decisions they make. If they don’t believe you know what you’re talking about, or that you’ll deliver on what you say, the rest of it doesn’t matter.
Your prospect should be doing 70% of the talking. You should be doing 30%.
I know that sounds straightforward. In practice, most salespeople get it completely the wrong way round. They arrive at a discovery call with a deck, a pitch, a plan — and spend the next 45 minutes delivering it. By the end, they’ve said a lot and learned almost nothing. Flip the ratio. Ask better questions. Then actually listen to the answers. That single shift will improve your conversion rate more than most other changes you could make.
Non-negotiable. Before you speak to any prospect, you should know what their business does, what pressures their sector is under right now, and something about the individual you’re speaking to. Not just their job title — what they’ve said publicly, what’s changed in their business recently, what they’re likely to care about.
I’ve sat in on sales calls where the rep clearly hadn’t looked at the company website. The prospect could tell. The conversation never really recovered. And the reason it matters so much in B2B specifically is that the people you’re selling to are busy and experienced. They can spot within about 90 seconds whether you’ve done your homework or you’re running a generic script.
Research also changes the quality of your questions. If you already know a business doubled its headcount in the past 18 months, you don’t need to ask if they’re growing. You can ask what operational challenges growth has exposed. That’s a completely different level of conversation.
Here’s what most salespeople get wrong about trust: they think it’s built in the big moments. The impressive pitch. The sharp answer to a tough question. The polished proposal.
It’s not. Or rather, it’s not only that. Trust is built — and lost — in the small things. Whether you replied to that email the same day or three days later. Whether the follow-up document you promised arrived when you said it would. Whether your catchy sales email subject lines actually reflected what was in the email when they opened it, or felt like a bait and switch.
Every micro-interaction is a signal. Buyers are processing those signals constantly, usually without realising it. Because if you’re unreliable during the sales process, they’re already calculating what it’s going to be like to actually work with you. And they’re usually right.
Every call, every meeting, every email should have a specific intended outcome before it happens. Not ‘have a good chat’ — something you can either achieve or not achieve. Are you trying to get a date for a second meeting? Identify who else is involved in the decision? Get sign-off to send a proposal?
Vague intentions produce vague outcomes. I’ve reviewed call recordings where genuinely good conversations — real rapport, real interest from the prospect — ended with absolutely nothing agreed. No next step. No commitment. Just ‘let’s stay in touch.’ That’s a dead end dressed up as progress.
Listening isn’t waiting for your turn to speak. That should be obvious, but it isn’t, because the pressure in a sales conversation is to be impressive — to say the right thing, to handle the objection well, to land the point. All of that internal noise gets in the way of actually hearing what the other person is telling you.
One thing I’ve noticed consistently in the salespeople who outperform their peers over a long period: they take notes during calls. Properly. And then they reference those notes in the follow-up email, sometimes even days later. It does two things — it shows the prospect that what they said actually registered, and it gives the salesperson something real to build the next conversation on, rather than starting again from scratch.
There’s also something that happens when you really listen during discovery: you start hearing the difference between what the customer says is the problem and what the actual problem is. Those two things are often not the same. The second one is where you find your real opportunity.
A prospect goes quiet the week before signing. A competitor comes in cheaper at the last minute. Budget gets frozen. Internal reorganisation puts the whole decision on hold.
None of that is in your control. And yet I’ve seen salespeople spend enormous amounts of mental energy on exactly these kinds of situations — obsessing, second-guessing, trying to find something they could have done differently. Sometimes there wasn’t anything.
What is in your control: how prepared you are, how quickly you follow up, how accurately your proposals reflect what the client actually said they needed, and how you behave when things go sideways. When handling difficult moments like price-matching requests, your ability to stay focused on your value — rather than panicking about the competition — comes directly from this mindset. The salespeople I’ve seen build genuinely consistent performance over the years are almost always the ones who are very clear about this distinction.
New business is exciting. Existing customers are less exciting and significantly more valuable, and most sales teams systematically underinvest in them.
The cost of acquiring a new B2B customer is multiples of what it costs to retain an existing one. They already trust you. They’ve already been through the procurement process. They know how you work. And if the relationship is in good shape, they’ll tell other people, which is where the right phrases when asking for referrals in sales really matter, because a warm introduction from a satisfied client will outperform cold outreach almost every time.
What I see happen too often is salespeople only reaching out to existing customers when they want to upsell something or when the renewal is coming up. Customers notice that pattern. Stay in contact genuinely — share something relevant, check in properly, ask how things are going without an agenda. That’s what turns a transactional relationship into a sticky one.
Everyone says this. Almost nobody does it properly.
What usually happens is this: a salesperson goes into a meeting with a working assumption about what the customer’s problem is, asks a few light questions that confirm that assumption, and then moves into their pitch. They’ve technically ‘discovered the pain point.’ But they’ve discovered the surface one, not the real one.
The real pain point — the one that’s keeping the decision-maker up at night, the one that has commercial consequences if it isn’t solved, the one that’s connected to their personal performance objectives — that usually takes longer to get to. It requires questions that go a layer deeper than the obvious ones. Understanding the 3 key drivers that increase value in your client’s eyes is a useful starting point for thinking about where that deeper pain usually lives.
Get to the real problem, and you’ll find your solution sells itself. Present a solution to the surface problem and you’ll be competing on price.
Data convinces people logically. Stories convince them in a way that sticks. You need both, but most B2B salespeople heavily over-index on data and barely use stories at all.
A case study from a similar company — same sector, similar size, comparable challenge — does something a feature list can’t. It makes the outcome feel real. The prospect can see their own situation in it. And crucially, it’s something they can take into their internal meetings with stakeholders who weren’t there, and use to make the case on your behalf.
Keep the story simple: the customer had a specific problem, we worked with them on it, and here’s what changed. Then use specific numbers where you have them. Vague success stories land softly. Specific ones land hard.
Rejection is structural in sales. It’s built into the job. If you’re only speaking to people who are definitely going to buy, you’re not really selling — you’re order-taking.
The question isn’t whether you’ll get rejected. It’s what happens to you when you do. Does a no send you into a spiral of self-doubt for the rest of the week? Or does it prompt you to think: was this a timing issue, a fit issue, a positioning issue, or was I just speaking to someone who was never going to buy regardless of what I did?
Not every rejection has a lesson in it, by the way. Sometimes the timing was genuinely wrong or the budget genuinely wasn’t there. The ability to tell the difference between ‘I could have done that better’ and ‘that one was never mine to win’ is an underrated skill.
The salespeople who improve consistently over a career are the ones who treat every conversation — win or lose — as data. They debrief themselves. They keep a note of objections they hear repeatedly. They pay attention to the conversations that felt easy and ask why.
Sales management training is valuable for exactly this reason. Not because a coach has some secret insight you don’t. But because having someone to process your experiences with — regularly, rigorously — helps you see patterns you’d otherwise miss when you’re inside your own head.
A running record of what objections you’re hearing, what responses landed, what fell flat — that accumulated knowledge is a genuine competitive advantage over time. Most salespeople don’t bother keeping it. The ones who do get better faster than the ones who rely purely on instinct.
None of the ten techniques above are complicated. If you’ve been in B2B sales for more than six months, you probably knew most of them already.
The challenge isn’t the knowledge. It’s the consistency. It’s doing thorough research when you’re short on time and tempted to wing it. It’s following up on the 2-2-2 cadence when you’ve got 30 other things in your pipeline. It’s genuinely listening on a call when you’re under pressure to push for a close. It’s staying close to existing customers when new business feels more urgent.
The gap between salespeople who hit their numbers reliably and the ones who don’t is rarely about knowing a technique the other person hasn’t heard of. It’s about doing the basics with genuine discipline, week after week, in the conversations that feel easy and the ones that don’t.
That’s what good B2B sales actually looks like from the inside.
Happy selling!
Sean
Sean McPheat
Managing Director
MTD Sales Training
Updated on: 26 March, 2026
Originally posted: 4 May 2019
Related Articles
Search For More
